Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 18, 1314-1318, December 1, 1958]
© 1958 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vesselinovitch, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vesselinovitch, S. D.

The Effects of the Time Interval and Sequence of the "Initiating" and "Promoting" Stimuli on the Tumor Yield*

S. D. Vesselinovitch

( Department of Medicine and Surgery, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Canada)

1. C57BL/C3H mice of both sexes were exposed to one, two or three "initiating" treatments of a 0.25 per cent solution of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene (DMBA).
2. In all groups the "promoting" treatment consisted of 33 applications of a croton seed extract (DJ-10), beginning on the 7th, 37th, or 67th day after the first DMBA exposure, and therefore either following "initiating" treatments or alternating with them.
3. A direct relationship between the number of tumors induced and the number of "initiating" stimuli resulted.
4. Alternating exposures to the "initiating" and "promoting" stimuli were more effective in inducing tumors than when the latter stimuli followed the former.
5. The significance of the results was discussed in the light of the two-stage mechanism of carcinogenesis.

* This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Received 7/ 7/58.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1958 by the American Association for Cancer Research.