Cancer Research  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 20, 1451-1456, November 1, 1960]
© 1960 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldin, A.

Influence of the Route of Administration on the Relative Effectiveness of 3',5'-Dichloroamethopterin and Amethopterin against Advanced Leukemia (L1210) in Mice*

John M. Venditti, Anthony W. Schrecker, J. A. R. Mead, Ira Kline and Abraham Goldin

( Laboratory of Chemical Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, and Microbiological Associates, Inc.,{dagger} Bethesda, Md.)

3',5'-Dichloroamethopterin (DCM) and amethopterin (MTX) were compared with respect to their ability to prolong the lifespan of mice with advanced leukemia (L1210) on subcutaneous and oral administration. In agreement with previous studies, subcutaneous DCM was markedly more effective than subcutaneous MTX in increasing the survival time of the mice. On oral administration, the antileukemic activity of both drugs was reduced. The reduction in the effectiveness of DCM via the oral route was so extensive that oral DCM was no more effective than oral MTX in increasing the survival time of the mice.

Whereas subcutaneous DCM was able to produce complete regression of the local tumor without body weight loss, reduction of the local tumor during oral DCM treatment was seen only in conjunction with severe body weight loss.

The advantage of the subcutaneous route over the oral route for DCM or MTX did not appear to be influenced by the schedule of treatment employed.

* Presented in part before the American Association for Cancer Research, Inc., April, 1960.

{dagger} National Institutes of Health Contract No. SA-43-ph-2371.

Received 4/20/60.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1960 by the American Association for Cancer Research.