Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 21, 422-426, April 1, 1961]
© 1961 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertalanffy, F. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bertalanffy, F. D.

Diagnostic Reliability of the Acridine Orange Fluorescence Microscope Method for Cytodiagnosis of Cancer*

Felix D. Bertalanffy

( Department of Anatomy, Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada)

The cytodiagnostic acridine orange (AO) fluorescence microscope method was applied to exfoliated material from 4348 cases. The method utilizes increased amounts of cytoplasmic ribonucleic acid (RNA) in malignant cells to demonstrate them in brilliant orange and red fluorescence colors. Scanning smears under low magnification readily revealed the presence of cells with increased fluorescence. Usually with higher magnifications it was determined by their morphology whether such cells were cytologically negative, suspicious, or malignant. To test the diagnostic reliability of the fluorescence method, the diagnoses thus reached were compared with those obtained independently by conventional cytodiagnosis on different smears from the same exfoliated specimens. The diagnoses were in agreement with material from the female genital tract, gastric washings, and urine. Some differences in the diagnoses were encountered with exfoliated specimens from the respiratory system. Presumably these were induced by the nature of this material rather than by the method, considering the initially lower reliability of cytodiagnosis with respiratory material in general, and the excellent agreement between fluorescence and conventional diagnoses on most other material. Thus, it is felt that the AO fluorescence method in proper procedure yields as reliable results as do other cytodiagnostic technics; this is in agreement with the findings of other workers who have tested the reliability of the fluorescence method for cytodiagnosis of cancer.

* This work is supported by research grants from the National Cancer Institute of Canada and the Damon Runyon Memorial Fund for Cancer Research.

Received 10/20/60.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1961 by the American Association for Cancer Research.