Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 22, 94-101, January 1, 1962]
© 1962 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sartorelli, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Booth, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sartorelli, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Booth, B. A.

Comparative Effects of Amethopterin and 3',5'-Dichloroamethopterin in Sensitive and Resistant Sublines of the Ehrlich Carcinoma

Alan C. Sartorelli* and Barbara A. Booth*

( Biomedical Division of The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc., Ardmore, Oklahoma)

The inhibitory effects of amethopterin and 3',5'-dichloroamethopterin were compared in antifolic-sensitive and -resistant sublines of the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. Molar equivalent doses of amethopterin and 3',5'-dichloroamethopterin caused similar retardation of glycine-2-C14 incorporation into polynucleotide purines, DNA thymine, lipide, and protein of the Ehrlich carcinoma. In general, the duration of inhibition of the various metabolic processes was comparable; however, the duration of inhibition of purine nucleotide biosynthesis de novo by 3',5'-dichloroamethopterin was slightly more transient than that of amethopterin. This may be responsible for the fact that equimolar doses of dichloroamethopterin are less effective than amethopterin as inhibitors of the growth of this neoplasm. The inhibition of sodium formate-C14 incorporation into DNA thymine of sensitive Ehrlich cells by both antifolics appeared to persist for a longer period than did the inhibition of purine synthesis. The results of these studies suggest that multiple factors are involved in the biochemical basis for resistance. At the dose levels employed, dichloroamethopterin caused inhibition of the measured metabolic reactions which was equal to or greater than that produced by amethopterin in the resistant neoplasm. A difference in the response of the variant cells to the two drugs was observed in that a degree of dependency to amethopterin was exhibited at all the dose levels tested, whereas a comparable effect by 3',5'-dichloroamethopterin was obtained only at the highest dose employed. The resistant tumor exhibited a pronounced increase in sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, whereas sensitivity to 6-azauracil, 6-azauridine, 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine, and to inhibitors of purine biosynthesis was not increased.

* Present address: Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Received 8/11/61.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1962 by the American Association for Cancer Research.