Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 23, 49-66, January 1, 1963]
© 1963 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mukherjee, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Heidelberger, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mukherjee, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Heidelberger, C.

Studies on Fluorinated Pyrimidines

XVI. Metabolism of 5-Fluorouracil-2-C14 and 5-Fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-2-C14 in Cancer Patients*

Kanai Lal Mukherjee{dagger}, Judith Boohar, Dorothy Wentland, Fred J. Ansfield and Charles Heidelberger{ddagger}

( McArdle Memorial Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin)

5-Fluorouracil-2-C14 (FU) and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-2-C14 (FUDR) were administered to cancer patients by oral, intravenous, intramuscular, and intraperitoneal routes. The radioactivity in the plasma, respiratory CO2, and urine was measured, and fractionation of radioactive materials on ion-exchange columns into the unchanged drug and the various degradation products was carried out with urines and some acid-soluble extracts of plasma. The level of radioactivity in the plasma was higher for the first 2 hours after intravenous injections of FU-2-C14 and FUDR-2-C14 than after administration by any other route. The unchanged drugs persisted longer in urine after intravenous injections than after oral, intramuscular, or intraperitoneal administrations. The excretion of radioactivity as respiratory CO2 was least after the intravenous injection of FUDR. It was concluded, therefore, that intravenous administration of both drugs is the method of choice in the clinical use of these drugs. There was more degradation of FU injected as a continuous infusion than following rapid intravenous injection, and the opposite was true for FUDR.

One patient, who tolerated large doses of FUDR without toxic manifestations, degraded the drug rapidly; whereas a second patient, who rapidly became toxic to FUDR, degraded the drug at a much slower rate. When the degradation of 3',5'-diacetyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyrudine-2-C14 and FUDR-2-C14, both given orally to the same patient, was compared, it was found that 5'-monoacetyl-FUDR was present in the urine 24 hours after administration of the diacetyl compound, whereas no unchanged drug was found in the urine after administration of FUDR. After intravenous injections of FU-2-C14 and FUDR-2-C14, radioactivity was found in the cerebrospinal fluid. Fractionation of the radioactive compounds demonstrated the presence of unchanged drug in the cerebrospinal fluid.

* This investigation was supported in part by grant, T-157, from the American Cancer Society.

{dagger} Fellow of the Damon Runyon Memorial Fund for Cancer Research.

{ddagger} American Cancer Society Professor of Oncology.

Received 6/11/62.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1963 by the American Association for Cancer Research.