Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 24, 120-124, January 1, 1964]
© 1964 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kollmann, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kollmann, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, E. E.

The Distribution and the Chemical Forms of the Radiation-Protective Agent AET in Leukemic Mice*

George Kollmann{dagger}, Bernard Shapiro and Emanuel E. Schwartz

( Research Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Southern Division, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

The distribution and the chemical nature of the protective agent in the various tissues of C57BL/6J male tumor-bearing mice given a protective dose of 2-mercaptoethylguanidine (MEG), the transguanylated form of the radiation-protective agent (AET), S-(2-aminoethyl)thiuronium bromide hydrobromide were studied. The mice carried a subcutaneously transplanted leukemia. Results were obtained 20 minutes after an intraperitoneal injection of 140 mg/kg MEG-S35 and at 30 minutes after oral administration of 400 mg/kg MEG-S35. Under both conditions the tumor took up less protective agent than did most of the vital organs. The tumor contained the same S35-labeled chemical forms that normal tissues contained—namely, protein-bound SAET, GED, 2-guanidoethanesulfinic acid, taurocyamine, sulfate, and S-acetyl-2-mercaptoethylguanidine. The protein-bound form consisted mainly of thioester-bound and mixed disulfide-bound protective agent. The tumor had less thioester-bound protective agent than did the small intestines, liver, and kidneys. In vitro studies of protective agent uptake by tissue slices showed that tumor slices took up as much protective agent as did liver or spleen slices. Compared with normal animals, tumor-bearing animals had difficulty excreting the protective agent, apparently as the result of some renal defect.

* This work was aided by Grant #T-150B from the American Cancer Society.

{dagger} Parts of this work will constitute part of a dissertation to be presented to the Graduate Council of Temple University by George Kollmann in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Received 8/14/63.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1964 by the American Association for Cancer Research.