Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 24, 379-387, April 1, 1964]
© 1964 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Thyge, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Thyge, G.

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Imbedding Cellophane and Polystyrene Films in Rats*

Enid T. Oppenheimer, Margaret Willhite, Arthur Purdy Stout, I. Danishefsky, Myer M. Fishman and George Thyge

( Institute of Cancer Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y.)

The results of imbedding cellophane subcutaneously in rats were compared with previous results with polystyrene; 280 films were imbedded subcutaneously in 140 rats, which were divided into three groups and observed for tumor incidence. All animals were permitted to live out their life span.

Group I: Films were removed at monthly intervals from the enveloping pockets induced.

Group II: Pockets as well as films were similarly removed and the pockets examined histologically.

Group III: Controls; films and pockets in situ throughout.

As with polystyrene, no tumors were produced when pockets were excised, and there was a reduction in number when films alone were removed. With polystyrene, film removal before 6 months entirely precluded tumor formation, but with cellophane after film removal, even at 3 months, some tumors still appeared. The control group showed the usual tumor incidence. Histological studies showed a much greater fibroblastic activity with cellophane than with polystyrene, especially in the early months. This may be related to the shorter time of contact necessary to initiate neoplastic change (3 months instead of 6).

Other differences found with cellophane are discussed, such as its marked tendency toward calcium deposition in pockets, in tumors, and on the film itself, as well as the possible relevance to tissue activity of its permeability and its reactive surface phenomena.

* This investigation was supported by a research grant, No. C-1620 (C 8–12), from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service.

Received 8/19/63.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1964 by the American Association for Cancer Research.