Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 24, 461-469, April 1, 1964]
© 1964 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sloboda, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sloboda, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, A. W.

A Laboratory Evaluation of 1,4-Dimethyl-1,4-diphenyl-2-tetrazene (Centrazene), a Carcinostatic Compound

Adolph E. Sloboda and Adolph W. Vogel

( Department of Metabolic Chemotherapy, Lederle Laboratories, American Cyanamid Company, Pearl River, New York)

The biological properties of 1,4-dimethyl-1,4-diphenyl-2-tetrazene (centrazene), a new anti-neoplastic compound which is not an alkylating agent, were described and compared with those of thioTEPA. Short-term studies demonstrated that both centrazene and thioTEPA inhibited the growth of 72j mammary adenocarcinoma growing in C3H mice. ThioTEPA produced concurrent bone marrow damage, and its effects were directly related to dosage. In contrast, the anti-tumor effects of centrazene did not appear related to dosage, nor was there any measurable evidence of bone marrow damage.

The effects of centrazene and thioTEPA upon the survival of C3H mice bearing a transplantable (72j) or spontaneous mammary tumor were compared by oral, subcutaneous, and intraperitoneal routes of administration. Both thioTEPA and centrazene prolonged the survival of mice bearing transplantable 72j mammary adenocarcinoma; however, the longest survivals were obtained with centrazene treatment. Only centrazene significantly prolonged the survival of mice bearing spontaneous tumors.

In contrast to the results obtained with mammary tumors, centrazene did not prolong the survival of mice bearing S-180, 6C3HED lymphosarcoma, or Harding-Passey melanoma or of rats bearing the Walker 256 carcinosarcoma.

Parenteral administration of centrazene produced optimum survival effects at daily doses ranging from 5.6 mg/kg (72j mammary adenocarcinoma) to 16.8 mg/kg (spontaneous mammary tumors). In diet experiments optimum survivals were obtained only when tumor-bearing mice consumed much higher daily doses of centrazene (about 2000 mg/kg body weight). This suggested that the compound was poorly absorbed orally or else inactivated in the digestive tract.

The weight gain and mortality of normal C3H mice were unaffected by subcutaneous doses of centrazene as high as 2000 mg/kg given daily for 10 days. In contrast, rats given subcutaneous doses of this compound ranging from 2000 to 0.4 mg/kg daily for 10 days showed various degrees of mortality and growth inhibition.

Received 9/28/63.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1964 by the American Association for Cancer Research.