Cancer Research TCM Europe  2010 Workshops
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 25, 980-985, August 1, 1965]
© 1965 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fishbein, W. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fishbein, W. N.

Induction of Chromosome Breaks in Cultured Normal Human Leukocytes by Potassium Arsenite, Hydroxyurea and Related Compounds

Joost J. Oppenheim and William N. Fishbein

( Medicine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, and Department of Pediatric Research, University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland)

Hydroxyurea and N-hydroxyurethane at mM concentrations produced a high incidence of chromosome breaks along with other signs of cell toxicity in short-term cultures of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated normal human leukocytes. Chromosome rearrangements as well as breaks were produced by µM levels of potassium arsenite, suggesting that interference with oxidative phosphorylation can result in chromosome fragmentation. Acetohydroxamic acid and hydroxylamine both resulted in signs of cell injury but no significant chromosomal damage at µM concentrations. Urea, although inactive at physiologic concentrations, at 50 mM produced marked chromosomal fragmentation and evidence of cytoxicity.

Received 1/29/65.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
Final Report of the Safety Assessment of Urea
International Journal of Toxicology, May 1, 2005; 24(3_suppl): 1 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
V. N. Hanft, S. R. Fruchtman, C. V. Pickens, W. F. Rosse, T. A. Howard, and R. E. Ware
Acquired DNA mutations associated with in vivo hydroxyurea exposure
Blood, June 1, 2000; 95(11): 3589 - 3593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
P. Cerutti
Prooxidant states and tumor promotion
Science, January 25, 1985; 227(4685): 375 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
K. Hansen and R. M. Stern
A Survey of Metal-induced Mutagenicity in Vitro and in Vivo
International Journal of Toxicology, November 1, 1984; 3(6): 381 - 430.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. B. LOURIA, M. M. JOSELOW, and A. A. BROWDER
The Human Toxicity of Certain Trace Elements
Ann Intern Med, February 1, 1972; 76(2): 307 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1965 by the American Association for Cancer Research.