Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 25, 1339-1347, September 1, 1965]
© 1965 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foulds, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foulds, L.

Multiple Etiologic Factors in Neoplastic Development

Leslie Foulds

Chester Beatty Research Institute, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Cancer Hospital, Fulham Road, London S.W. 3, England

This discussion is concerned with the multiplicity of factors that influence the initiation of neoplasia and its subsequent course. Factors that are not strictly "carcinogenic" may, nevertheless, affect the ultimate result decisively. Both genetic and nongenetic factors are implicated in the delivery of a carcinogen to the target tissue in an effective form and amount, and others govern the responsiveness of the tissue. Several factors may operate concurrently or consecutively. The cooperative action of genetic and hormonal factors together with a milk-borne virus is ordinarily most effective in producing a high yield of mammary tumors in mice. Epidermal carcinogenesis provides evidence of successive stages differently controlled. the first stage of initiation establishes a persistent region of incipient neoplasia whence tumors of varied kinds emerge at a later time. When the carcinogenic stimulus is optimal and the genetic sensitivity high, the early lesions are multiple, benign, or "imperfect" neoplasms of the kind usually described as "precancerous"; they are important because progression to malignant neoplasia may take place in one or more of them and because they disclose a region of incipient neoplasia within which malignant tumors may emerge later without spatial relationship to the early lesions.

Effective management of neoplastic disease is likely to depend on better knowledge than is yet available of the successive stages of neoplastic development and of the diverse factors operating at each of them. Different forms of neoplasia will probably call for different kinds of management. Initiation by known carcinogenic agents should be minimized. If the initiating agent is unknown, progression may still be controlled effectively, as in neoplasia of the uterine cervix, by treatment at the "precancer" stage of carcinoma in situ. Even at later stages, some control is practicable, as evidenced by the substantial, if limited, benefits of endocrine therapy for carcinoma of the breast and prostate.

Initiation, the crucial event in experimental carcinogenesis, probably entails persistent replicable change in the affected cells, not necessarily of the kind described as mutation. Recent developments in the theory of genetic structure and genetic action will predictably become increasingly important in the study of neoplasia and are discussed here in a preliminary way.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. P. Witz
Yin-Yang Activities and Vicious Cycles in the Tumor Microenvironment
Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 9 - 13.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Liu, J. McCarthy, and S. Ladisch
Membrane Ganglioside Enrichment Lowers the Threshold for Vascular Endothelial Cell Angiogenic Signaling
Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 66(21): 10408 - 10414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. Jang, T. Savarese, H. P. Low, S. Kim, H. Vogel, D. Lapointe, T. Duong, N. S. Litofsky, J. M. Weimann, A. H. Ross, et al.
Osteopontin Expression in Intratumoral Astrocytes Marks Tumor Progression in Gliomas Induced by Prenatal Exposure to N-Ethyl-N-Nitrosourea
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 168(5): 1676 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. J. Kelloff, J. A. O'Shaughnessy, G. B. Gordon, E. T. Hawk, and C. C. Sigman
Counterpoint: Because Some Surrogate End Point Biomarkers Measure the Neoplastic Process They Will Have High Utility in the Development of Cancer Chemopreventive Agents against Sporadic Cancers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 593 - 596.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1965 by the American Association for Cancer Research.