Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 26, 2145-2147, October 1, 1966]
© 1966 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lilienfeld, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kordan, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lilienfeld, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kordan, B.

A Study of Variability in the Interpretation of Chest X-rays in the Detection of Lung Cancer

Abraham M. Lilienfeld and Bernard Kordan

Department of Chronic Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, and the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

As part of the American Cancer Society-VA Cooperative Pilot Study for the evaluation of radiologic and sputum cytologic screening in the early detection of lung cancer, it was possible to obtain some estimate of the variability in the interpretation of chest X-rays by radiologists. With respect to interindividual variability, the positive readings of one radiologist will be called positive by another radiologist in about 50–60% of instances and the negative readings in about 90–95% of instances. Similar degrees of agreement were found when a radiologist read a series of X-rays twice. This degree of variability is not unexpected and indicates the need for having 2 radiologists read X-rays independently in surveys in order to maximize the yield of suspect cases.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Association for Cancer Research.