Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 26, 2196-2201, October 1, 1966]
© 1966 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Busch, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Busch, H.

Base Composition of RNA Fractions of Nuclei of Walker Tumor Isolated with the Citric Acid Procedure1

Ken Higashi, Helen R. Adams and Harris Busch

Department of Pharmacology and Tumor By-Products Laboratory, Baylor University College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

RNA was extracted from tumor nuclei isolated with the citric acid procedure. The RNA was subfractionated with phenol, and fractions of differing sedimentation constants were separated on sucrose density gradients. Each peak was refractionated by repeated sucrose density gradient centrifugation until a symmetric peak was obtained. After phenol fractionation, the interphase or iRNA obtained by extraction at 65°C had a higher uptake of orthophosphate-32P and larger amounts of rapidly sedimenting RNA than the aRNA fraction obtained after extraction at room temperature.

The individual peaks of RNA had characteristic base compositions. The 6 S peak of the iRNA had a high content of adenylic and uridylic acids as determined both by optical density and 32P analyses. It differed from the 6 S peak of the aRNA which contained more guanylic and cytidylic acid. As has been found for ribosomal RNA, nuclear 18 S RNA had a higher content of both adenylic and uridylic acids than 28 S RNA. The 35 S and 45 S fractions of iRNA and aRNA had a high content of guanylic and cytidylic acids as determined both by ultraviolet and 32P analysis. The finding that the content of adenylic and uridylic acids of the 35 S and 45 S RNA of tumor nuclei was markedly lower than that of nuclei of rat liver supports previous studies which showed marked differences of the base compositions of newly synthesized rapidly sedimenting nuclear RNA of the Walker tumor and liver (19).

1 These studies were supported in part by grants from the American Cancer Society, the Jane Coffin Childs Fund, the National Science Foundation and USPHS Grant CA 08182.

Received 3/17/66.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Association for Cancer Research.