Cancer Research Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine  Joint Metastasis Research Society-AACR Conference on Metastasis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 26, 753-760, July 1, 1966]
© 1966 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sloboda, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sloboda, A. E.

Reevaluation of a Screening Program for Antineoplastic Agents

Adolph E. Sloboda1

A total of 389 compounds and 40 antibiotics were active in the sequential screening program for antineoplastic agents at Lederle Laboratories during the past 8 years. Many of these compounds were folic acid antagonists, alkylating agents, or nicotinamide antagonists (thiadiazoles). The distribution of antineoplastic activity against the 3-tumor screen (Sarcoma 180, 6C3HED lymphosarcoma, and 72j mammary adenocarcinoma) was reviewed. Of the compounds, 78.4 and 10.3% were specifically active against the 72j tumor and the 6C3HED (Gardner) lymphosarcoma, respectively; 85 and 5% of the antibiotics were active against the 2 tumors. In contrast only 1% of the compounds and 2.5% of the antibiotics were specifically active against Sarcoma 180: azaserine, 2 folic acid antagonists, s-triazol-3-ylurea, and an antibiotic preparation. These 5 substances seemed like a small return for the effort expended in testing with Sarcoma 180 during the last 8 years. The importance of the 3 tumor types to the sequential screening program was further examined by reviewing the activity of 36 known carcinostatic compounds. Of these, 34 were active against either the 72j or the 6C3HED tumors or both. None of the 3 tumors detected vincaleukoblastine sulfate (VLB). Azaserine was the only substance which required Sarcoma 180 testing for detection. It was concluded that a sequential antineoplastic screening program with only the 72j and 6C3HED tumors would have found almost all the known compounds and all clinically useful compounds now detected by the 3-tumor screen.

1 Department of Metabolic Chemotherapy, Lederle Laboratories Division, American Cyanamid Co., Pearl River, New York.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1966 by the American Association for Cancer Research.