Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 27, 172-174, January 1, 1967]
© 1967 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wynder, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wynder, E. L.

The Reduction of the Tumorigenicity of Cigarette Smoke Condensate by Addition of Sodium Nitrate to Tobacco1

Dietrich Hoffmann and Ernest L. Wynder

Division of Environmental Cancerigenesis, Sloan-Kettering Institute For Cancer Research, New York, New York

The tumorigenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate and the concentrations of certain selected chemical constituents in the smoke of cigarettes treated with 8.3% NaNO3 are compared with those of a standard (untreated) cigarette. The NaNO3 treatment resulted in a significant reduction of particulate matter and also a statistically significant selective reduction of nicotine, phenol, and benzo(a)pyrene in the smoke as compared with the untreated cigarette.

Smoke condensate from the treated cigarette proved to be less toxic and gave a significantly lower tumor yield than the condensate from the standard cigarette. The academic and practical aspects of these findings will be discussed.

1 This work was supported by the Research Grant E-231 from the American Cancer Society and in part by the Institutional Grant CA-08748 from the National Cancer Institute, NIH.

Received 6/20/66. Accepted 8/19/66.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. Laitakari and F. Stenback
Collagen Matrix in Development and Progression of Experimentally Induced Respiratory Neoplasms in the Hamster
Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2001; 29(5): 514 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
A Rodgman, C J Smith, and T A Perfetti
The composition of cigarette smoke: a retrospective, with emphasis on polycyclic components
Human and Experimental Toxicology, October 1, 2000; 19(10): 573 - 595.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Hoffmann and E. L. Wynder
Smoke of Cigarettes and Little Cigars: An Analytical Comparison
Science, December 15, 1972; 178(4066): 1197 - 1199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. H. Terrell and I. Schmeltz
Cigarettes: Chemical Effects of Sodium Nitrate Content
Science, June 28, 1968; 160(3835): 1456 - 1456.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1967 by the American Association for Cancer Research.