Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 27, 1805-1812, October 1, 1967]
© 1967 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, B. W.

Effect of Methyl Methanesulfonate on the Growth of P388 Lymphoma Cells In Vitro and on Their Rate of Progress through the Cell Cycle1

Margaret Fox and B. W. Fox

Paterson Laboratories, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Manchester 20, England

The effect of methyl methanesulfonate on the growth kinetics of the cloned line P388F of the P388 lymphoma in vitro in suspension culture was studied. The proportion of live and dead cells, mitotic index, labeling index, percentage of labeled mitoses, and grain counts were examined in an asynchronous population, during the period of departure from exponential growth. From this data, it was shown that the S (DNA-synthetic) period was the most sensitive phase of the cell cycle. DNA synthesis from labeled thymidine was increased and the duration of the S was prolonged. The rate of passage of cells from S to G2 was more affected than that from G1 to S, but both were reduced relative to control rates. Cells in G2 at the time of treatment were not delayed through the first post-treatment mitosis but were delayed through the subsequent G1. Cells in G1 at the time of treatment were delayed in their passage through the subsequent S period. This alkane sulfonate induced periods of increased mitotic activity, each of which was followed by a wave of increased cell death. Recovery to exponential growth at the control rate occurred four days after treatment.

1 This work was supported by grants from the British Empire Cancer Campaign and The Medical Research Council.

Received 2/14/67. Accepted 5/29/67.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1967 by the American Association for Cancer Research.