Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 27, 2129-2136, November 1, 1967]
© 1967 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Dyk, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krakoff, I. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Dyk, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krakoff, I. H.

Clinical Evaluation of 5-Bromo-5-fluoro-6-methoxy-dihydro-2'-deoxyurindine1

J. J. Van Dyk, B. D. Clarkson, R. Duschinsky, O. Keller, E. La Sala and I. H. Krakoff

Division of Chemotherapy Research, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, the Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial and James Ewing Hospitals, and Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Nutley, New Jersey

5 - Bromo - 5 - fluoro - 6 - methoxy - dihydro - 2' - deoxyuridine (MeOBrFUdR) was given to 22 patients with far-advanced, nonresectable neoplastic diseases. Of these, 16 received an adequate course of therapy. MeOBrFUdR produced biologic effects indistinguishable from those caused by 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) at approximately equimolar doses. Two of the 16 patients showed significant therapeutic responses, a response rate that would be expected with FUdR.

By biochemical and microbiologic methods, appreciable levels of FUdR were found to persist in the blood and urine of patients for 16 hours after administration of MeOBrFUdR, a much longer period than that following the administration of similar doses of FUdR. The persistence of detectable levels of FUdR in the blood did not result in increased toxicity of MeOBrFUdR as compared to FUdR.

1 This investigation was supported in part by Research Grants CA-03215 and CA-05826 and CA-08748 from the National Cancer Institute, USPHS. Some of this material was presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research in 1966 (22). Send reprint requests to Dr. Bayard Clarkson, Sloan-Kettering Institute, 410 East 68th Street, New York, N. Y. 10021.

Received 1/27/67. Accepted 6/29/67.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1967 by the American Association for Cancer Research.