Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 27, 293-296, February 1, 1967]
© 1967 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruben, L. N.
Right arrow Articles by Balls, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruben, L. N.
Right arrow Articles by Balls, M.

Further Studies of a Transmissible Amphibian Lymphosarcoma1

Laurens N. Ruben and Michael Balls2

The Reed Institute, Portland, Oregon

A variety of aspects of lymphosarcoma transmission were investigated in adult Triturus viridescens and Rana pipiens. Freshly biopsied and frozen cellular implants of lymphosarcoma from Xenopus laevis were used to induce the cancer in both the newts and the frogs. Cellular implants of these induced tumors were then used allogenically to transmit the cancer. Homogenates of Xenopus tumors and of tumors formed in the newts and frogs were successfully used to pass on the cancer. Filtered homogenate (filter size, 450 mµ) and supernatant fluids of centrifuged homogenate (20,000 x g for 30 min) were also infectious. Both frog and newt tumors could be back-transferred to Xenopus.

Horizontal transmission was demonstrated in newts, and urine collected from lymphosarcoma-bearing frogs was used to transmit the tumor to young adult Xenopus. Newts thymectomized prior to injection with tumor homogenate developed lymphosarcomas, which demonstrates that this lymphoid disease is not thymic dependent.

The implantation of methylcholanthrene crystals with and without the simultaneous injection of tumor homogenate indicated that the carcinogen will not induce the lymphosarcoma in either species tested in the absence of the lymphosarcoma agent. Previous reports of the induction of this tumor should be interpreted in terms of augmentation, rather than induction.

1 Supported by USPHS Grant CA-08268 from the National Cancer Institute of the NIH and by the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research.

2 Fellow of the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research. Present address: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.

Received 6/30/66. Accepted 9/ 1/66.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1967 by the American Association for Cancer Research.