Cancer Research Cancer Research Funding Available  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 28, 274-279, February 1, 1968]
© 1968 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tarr, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burke, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tarr, N.

A Clinical Evaluation of Dose and Schedule of Administration of Cytosine Arabinoside (NSC 63878)

Philip J. Burke1, Arthur A. Serpick, Paul P. Carbone and Norman Tarr

Baltimore Cancer Research Center, USPHS Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, and the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Cytosine arabinoside (1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine hydrochloride) was given to 24 patients with varied tumors for 32 trials in a study designed to compare toxicity of continuous infusion and single daily injections for a 5-day period. At low dose ranges of 50 and 100 mg/sq m, continuous infusion produced greater bone marrow depression than single injections. However, as dosage was increased from 150 to 300 mg/sq m, equal depression was encountered with either schedule. Increasing the dose to 400 and 600 mg/sq m by injection produced no further myelosupression. Except for mild nausea and occasional vomiting, no other toxicity was encountered. The importance of varying treatment schedules in cancer chemotherapy is discussed.

1 Present address: Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Received 3/17/67. Accepted 10/ 7/67.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. Pessina, B. Albella, M. Bayo, J. Bueren, P. Brantom, S. Casati, C. Croera, G. Gagliardi, P. Foti, R. Parchment, et al.
Application of the CFU-GM Assay to Predict Acute Drug-Induced Neutropenia: An International Blind Trial to Validate a Prediction Model for the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Myelosuppressive Xenobiotics
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2003; 75(2): 355 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. W. CARLSON and B. I. SIKIC
Continuous Infusion or Bolus Injection in Cancer Chemotherapy
Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1983; 99(6): 823 - 833.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. F. BETTS, D. A. ZAKY, R. G. DOUGLAS Jr., and G. ROYER
Ineffectiveness of Subcutaneous Cytosine Arabinoside in Localized Herpes Zoster
Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1975; 82(6): 778 - 783.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. B. Hanshaw
Herpesvirus hominis Infections in the Fetus and the Newborn
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 1973; 126(4): 546 - 555.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1968 by the American Association for Cancer Research.