Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 28, 1773-1782, September 1, 1968]
© 1968 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Studzinski, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ellem, K. A. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Studzinski, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ellem, K. A. O.

Differences between Diploid and Heteroploid Cultured Mammalian Cells in Their Response to Puromycin Aminonucleoside1 ,2

George P. Studzinski and Kay A. O. Ellem

Department of Pathology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107

Treatment of several heteroploid cultured mammalian cell lines with suitably low concentrations of aminonucleoside resulted in partial depression of ribosomal RNA synthesis, shown by methylated albumin-Kieselguhr column chromatography of labeled nucleic acids, and a lowering of the cell RNA content. These RNA-depleted heteroploid cell lines containued to proliferate at control rates for several cell generations. Proliferation of diploid cell lines, on the other hand, was inhibited by aminonucleoside without depression in cell RNA content. Methylated albumin-Kieselguhr chromatography of nucleic acids showed that the inhibition of ribosomal RNA synthesis was quickly followed by the inhibition of syntheses of the other types of RNA and of DNA. The inhibitory effects of amino-nucleoside on both heteroploid and diploid cells were prevented by simultaneous treatment with inosine, suggesting that the action of the inhibitor was similar in the cells studied, since uptake of labeled aminonucleoside into the cell was not affected by the nucleoside.

These results show that the heteroploid cell has a greater capacity to proliferate when its rate of ribosomal RNA synthesis is depressed, probably because its ability to synthesize DNA has been freed from some of the controls present in diploid cells.

1 Supported by USPHS Grants 2RO1 CA-05402-08 and 5TO1 GM-00813-06.

2 Some of these results were reported previously in a preliminary form (30), and were presented at the 9th International Cancer Congress, Tokyo, Japan, October 23–29, 1966.

Received 1/17/68. Accepted 5/11/68.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. J. Cholon and G. P. Studzinski
Metabolic Differences between Normal and Neoplastic Cells: Effects of Aminonucleoside on Cytoplasmic Messenger RNA
Science, April 12, 1974; 184(4133): 160 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1968 by the American Association for Cancer Research.