Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 30, 184-188, January 1, 1970]
© 1970 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugiura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugiura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, G. B.

A Comparison of the Oncogenicities of 3-Hydroxyxanthine, Guanine 3-N-Oxide, and Some Related Compounds1

Kanematsu Sugiura, Morris N. Teller, James C. Parham and George Bosworth Brown

Divisions of Experimental Chemotherapy and Biological Chemistry, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York 10021

Assays of the oncogenic N-oxide derivatives of xanthine and guanine, which have now been proven to be 3-hydroxyxanthine and guanine 3-N-oxide, continue to show about equal activities. Parallel titrations at 1.0, 0.5, and 0.1 mg/week for 26 weeks, administered subcutaneously, in female Wistar rats show that, for these conditions, the 50% tumor incidence doses lie between the two lower dose levels, or between a total of 2 and 10 mg of the free bases.

The isomeric 1-hydroxyxanthine elicits a different response. While being administered it induces a severe inflammatory and granulomatous condition, but it leads to only a small incidence of tumors. This, coupled with the confirmed low incidence of tumors from 6-mercaptopurine 3-N-oxide, indicates that the oncogenicity of purine N-oxide derivatives is influenced both by the position of the N-oxide and by other substituents.

Although the assay response to adenine 1-N-oxide has been variable, a sufficient incidence of tumors has been observed to indicate that it is at least a moderately oncogenic purine N-oxide.

The inactivities of the parent purines and of a few other purine derivatives are recorded.

1 This investigation was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute, Grant No. CA-08748, the Damon Runyon Memorial Fund, DRG-1014, and the Atomic Energy Commission, Contract No. AT[30-1]910. This is Paper XXXII in the series on "Purine N-Oxides." A portion was presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Atlantic City, N. J., April 1968 (27).

Received 6/10/69. Accepted 7/16/69.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. Stohrer and G. B. Brown
Oncogenic Purine Derivatives: Evidence for a Possible Proximate Oncogen
Science, March 20, 1970; 167(3925): 1622 - 1624.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1970 by the American Association for Cancer Research.