Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 30, 2514-2520, October 1, 1970]
© 1970 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, S. S.

DNA Polymerase and DNA Replication during Lymphocyte Transformation1

Lawrence A. Loeb2, Joan L. Ewald and Shyam S. Agarwal3

The Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111

The initiation of DNA synthesis in human peripheral blood lymphocytes is coincident with the induction of DNA polymerase activity. Phytohemagglutinin was added to cultures of lymphocytes, and, at sequential times thereafter, incorporation of thymidine into DNA and various enzymatic activities in the DNA synthetic pathway were determined. An increase of 30- to 150-fold in DNA polymerase activity paralleled in time and magnitude the ability of the cells to synthesize DNA. An increase in DNase activity also paralleled DNA synthesis and the rise in polymerase. The activities of thymidine kinase and thymidine monophosphate kinase multiplied about 2- to 10-fold. In contrast, kinase such as deoxyguanosine monophosphate kinase and guanosine monophosphate kinase, which were present in greater activity, were not increased by phytohemagglutinin.

The induction of these enzyme activities by phytohemagglutinin appears to require RNA synthesis. Actinomycin D in sufficient amounts abolished the phytohemagglutinin-mediated increases in RNA and DNA synthesis, enzyme activities, and lymphocyte transformation. Smaller amounts of actinomycin prevented the induction of DNA polymerase, thymidine kinase, and thymidine monophosphate kinase, as well as the increase in RNA and DNA synthesis, but did not hinder lymphocyte transformation. Accordingly, the morphological changes characterizing lymphocyte transformation do not require DNA replication or increases in enzyme activities associated with this replication. In contrast, the stimulation of DNA synthesis is rigidly dependent on the induction of DNA polymerase.

1 This investigation was supported by NIH Grants CA-11524 and CA-06551, and by grants to this Institute from NIH (CA-06927 and FR-05539), Stanley C. Dordick Foundation, and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

2 Also a member of the Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

3 Research training fellowship awarded by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization.

Received 4/ 7/70. Accepted 6/18/70.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1970 by the American Association for Cancer Research.