Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  09 AM Call for Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 30, 2379-2387, September 1, 1970]
© 1970 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, A. R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, A. R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, M. C.

Mechanism of the Growth Inhibition Potentiation Arising from Combination of 6-Mercaptopurine with 6-(Methylmercapto)purine Ribonucleoside1

A. R. P. Paterson and M. C. Wang2

University of Alberta Cancer Research Unit (McEachern Laboratory) and Department of Biochemistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

The antitumor effects of 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) and 6-(methylmercapto)purine ribonucleoside (Me6MPR) are distinctly potentiated when these agents are used together in the treatment of certain mouse tumors, including the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. This paper is concerned with the biochemical mechanism of this potentiation.

Prior treatment of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells with Me6MPR enhanced several fold their ability to convert 6MP to 6MP ribonucleotide (thioinosinate) and their content of 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate. These related effects were demonstrable 96 hr after a single Me6MPR treatment and were evidently due to the presence in the tumor cells of methylthioinosinate, which had a half-life in excess of 96 hr. Both effects were absent when tumor cells were treated with Me6MPR plus adenine.

The inhibition of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cell proliferation in vivo by single 6MP-Me6MPR treatments was distinctly increased if the Me6MPR component was given prior to 6MP. This result and the coincident changes in 6MP and 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate metabolism indicate that the Me6MPR-induced stimulation of 6MP anabolism is an important factor in the 6MP-Me6MPR therapeutic potentiation.

1 This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada and the Medical Research Council of Canada.

2 Present address: Department of Experimental Therapeutics Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, N. Y. 14203.

Received 6/11/69. Accepted 5/15/70.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1970 by the American Association for Cancer Research.