Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 31, 1943-1950, December 1, 1971]
© 1971 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Pong, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Pong, R. S.

Structure-Activity Relationships in DNA Binding and Nuclear Effects of Aflatoxin and Analogs1

G. S. Edwards2, G. N. Wogan, M. B. Sporn3 and R. S. Pong

Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

The ability of aflatoxins B1, B2, and G1 to inhibit RNA polymerase activity and decrease the RNA content in rat hepatocyte nuclei was found to be qualitatively similar to the carcinogenic and acute and subacute toxic actions of these compounds. Aflatoxin B1 was approximately 3 times more effective than G1 in reducing nRNA synthesis; aflatoxin B2 had no effect on RNA polymerase activity at a dose of 200 mg/kg. Similar activity ratios also were observed regarding loss of rat liver nRNA following aflatoxin dosing; aflatoxin B1 was more potent than G1, while aflatoxin B2 had no effect on nRNA content.

Aflatoxins B1 and G1 were shown by electron microscopy to cause a rapid macrosegregation of the fibrillar and granular portions of the hepatocyte nucleolus. Aflatoxin B2 (200 mg/kg) induced only minimal segregation of these components (microsegregation). Coumarin, tetrahydrodeoxyaflatoxin B1, and the inactive aflatoxin analogs, 5,7-dimethoxycyclopentene[c]coumarin, 5,7-dimethoxycyclopentenone[3,2-c]coumarin, 5,7-dimethoxycyclopentenone[2,3-c]coumarin caused no observable ultrastructural alterations.

The ability of aflatoxins B1 and B2, tetrahydrodeoxyaflatoxin B1, and 5,7-dimethoxycyclopentenone[2,3-c]coumarin to bind to native calf thymus DNA was studied by equilibrium dialysis. While all 4 compounds have the same value for their theoretical saturation binding concentration (1 mole of ligand per 25 moles of nucleotide), their association constants, K, vary significantly. 5,7-Dimethoxycyclopentenone[2,3-c]coumarin has the highest affinity for DNA (K = 5.4 x 104) followed, in decreasing order, by aflatoxin B1 (K = 2.1 x 104), aflatoxin B2 (K = 1.2 x 104), and tetrahydrodeoxyaflatoxin B1 (K = 6.9 x 103). The high affinity of 5,7-dimethoxycyclopentenone[2,3-c]coumarin for DNA is also reflected by a shift in its absorption peak near 360 nm to a longer wavelength and a marked hypochromism in the presence of DNA. The in vitro binding of these aflatoxin analogs does not accurately reflect their in vivo potency as toxins and carcinogens, as reported in the preceding paper (44).

A comparative study on the tissue distribution and excretion showed that twice as much radioactivity derived from aflatoxin B1-14C was present in rat liver 3 hr after injection than the amount derived from aflatoxin B2-14C under comparable conditions. The larger concentration of aflatoxin B1-14C in liver was accounted for by a smaller urinary excretion of the label. All other organs and routes of excretion showed no differences in content of radioactivity derived from the 2 toxins. The 2-fold difference in liver content of 14C from aflatoxin B1 versus aflatoxin B2 was not sufficient to account for large differences in acute activities of these 2 compounds on the basis of concentration alone.

A marked parallelism between the acute and carcinogenic potency of a number of aflatoxin analogs has been reported in this and the preceding paper. Possible reasons for this parallelism and the potential value of the short-term effects as predictors of carcinogenic potency are discussed.

1 This is Paper 2 of a series. Financial support was provided by National Cancer Institute Contract PH 43-62-468 and by USPHS Training Grant ES 00056-05.

2 Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Rockefeller University, New York, N. Y. 10021.

3 Present address: National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Md. 20014.

Received 4/20/71. Accepted 7/20/71.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Cancer Research.