Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 31, 1971-1976, December 1, 1971]
© 1971 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casazza, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cuonzo, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casazza, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cuonzo, G. D.

Interference of Daunomycin and Adriamycin on the Growth and Regression of Murine Sarcoma Virus (Moloney) Tumors in Mice1

A. M. Casazza, A. Di Marco and G. Di Cuonzo

Division of Experimental Oncogenesis B, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy

The effect of daunomycin and adriamycin on the growth and regression of primary or transplantable murine sarcoma virus (Moloney)-induced tumors in mice has been studied. In the control groups, in most cases tumors regressed completely; tumor recurrence was observed in about 10% of the animals.

Treatment with daunomycin before infection inhibits the spontaneous tumor regression. Treatment with daunomycin after the infection causes a slight reduction of tumor size as compared to the controls and a high incidence of tumor recurrence. Recurring tumors progress until death of the animal. Tumor recurrence in daunomycin-treated animals depends on the age of the animal, daunomycin dose, and viral-infecting dose. Treatment with adriamycin before the infection causes delay and inhibition of tumor growth and does not affect tumor regression. Treatment with adriamycin after infection causes a greater reduction of tumor size than with daunomycin while tumor recurrence takes place later in time. In daunomycin- and adriamycin-treated animals, the titer of virus-neutralizing antibodies is equally reduced, and virus is present in the spleen.

The results show that both antibiotics have immunodepressive activity and suggest that adriamycin is less active than daunomycin in causing tumor recurrence or inhibiting tumor regression because of its higher effectiveness in destroying the primary tumor cells.

1 Preliminary reports presented at the VIII Simposio Nazionale della Società Italiana di Cancerologia, Roma, December 1969, and at the Tenth International Cancer Congress, Abstracts, pp. 391–392, 1970, Houston, Texas, May 1970.

Received 4/20/70. Accepted 7/21/71.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Cancer Research.