Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 31, 297-307, March 1, 1971]
© 1971 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sobel, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Biedler, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sobel, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Biedler, J. L.

Hybridization of Actinomycin D- and Amethopterin-resistant Chinese Hamster Cells in Vitro1

Jael S. Sobel2, Alberta M. Albrecht, Hansjörg Riehm3 and June L. Biedler4

Division of Drug Resistance, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York 10021

Hybrid cells were isolated from mixtures of two diploid strains of Chinese hamster cells maintained in vitro. One parent strain was highly resistant to amethopterin, had an increased level of dihydrofolate reductase activity, and was capable of forming tumors on heterotransplantation. The other parent strain, highly resistant to actinomycin D, had a low tumor-forming capacity and a low level of reductase. Karyotype analysis confirmed hybridization of these strains.

Studies of drug resistance and dihydrofolate reductase activity in cloned hybrid sublines indicated differences in the inheritance of resistance to amethopterin and to actinomycin D. Enzyme activity and resistance to amethopterin were intermediate between those of the parent strains, which suggested lack of interaction between the parental genomes. In contrast, resistance to actinomycin D appeared to be inherited as a dominant trait. Tumor-forming capacities of hybrid clones were as high and as low as or in between those of the parent strains.

1 This investigation was supported in part by USPHS Research Grant CA 08748 and by American Cancer Society Grant T-107.

2 Supported by the Ethel Darby Noble Fellowship Fund. Present address: Hasharon Hospital, Petach Tikvah, Israel.

3 Present address: Kinderklinik der Freien Universität, 1 Berlin 19, Germany.

4 To whom reprint requests should be sent at Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, N. Y. 10021.

Received 7/ 8/70. Accepted 11/16/70.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Cancer Research.