Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 31, 496-500, May 1, 1971]
© 1971 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaage, J.
Right arrow Articles by Merrick, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaage, J.
Right arrow Articles by Merrick, S.

Effect of Immune Status on the Development of Artificially Induced Metastases in Different Anatomical Locations1

Jan Vaage, Kuang Chen2 and Suzanne Merrick

Section of Experimental Radiotherapy, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston, Houston, Texas 77025

Using a syngeneic methylcholanthrene-induced mouse sarcoma of recent origin and with demonstrated immunogenicity, we studied the effect of the immune status of the host on tumor growth in four different anatomical locations. For simulation of metastatic spread, tumor cells were selectively "seeded" in the lungs via the tail vein and in the liver via hepatic portal vein injection. Tumor growth was also studied in s.c. and i.p. injection sites.

Host resistance following sensitization was expressed most strongly in the liver and lungs and less strongly in the s.c. and i.p. locations. Sensitization by living tumor implants surgically removed after a period of growth left the hosts more resistant than the mice with sensitizing implants that had been killed by local irradiation. Immunotherapy consisting of s.c. injection of killed tumor tissue after challenge in addition to presensitization resulted in stronger resistance than presensitization alone.

The incidence of tumor growth was higher in sublethally irradiated mice than in untreated, normal control mice. This indicates that even the presumably weak first phase of the developing immune response initiated in control mice by the challenge implant was important in controlling the development of tumor growth.

1 This work was supported in part by USPHS Grants CA05047 and CA11138.

2 Doctoral candidate in the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.

Received 11/ 9/70. Accepted 1/20/71.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1971 by the American Association for Cancer Research.