Cancer Research  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 32, 193-199, February 1, 1972]
© 1972 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaage, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaage, J.

Specific Desensitization of Resistance against a Syngeneic Methylcholanthrene-induced Sarcoma in C3Hf Mice1

Jan Vaage2

Section of Experimental Radiotherapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston, Houston, Texas 77025

The effect of residual or reinjected tumor tissues on specific host antitumor resistance has been studied with a syngeneic methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma. Sensitized mice showed a strong resistance to the growth of injected fibrosarcoma cells if the sensitizing tumor implants were removed before the time of challenge. If large sensitizing tumors were left in situ until after the challenge injection of tumor cells or if suspensions of killed tumor cells were injected into sensitized, surgically cured tumor hosts, the immune resistance of the hosts was impaired but not abrogated. Injection of graded doses of killed tumor cells about the time of challenge showed that the depression of host resistance was dose related. Small (6- x 6-mm) sensitizing tumors left in situ after challenge injection of tumor cells did not affect the resistance of the hosts, whereas larger (13- x 13-mm) tumors had a depressive effect. Depression of resistance by injection of killed tumor cells was most effective during the week following challenge. The depression was specific, and resistance was not impaired by the presence of a growing implant or by injected, killed cells of an antigenically unrelated syngeneic mammary carcinoma.

The depression of host resistance by antigenic tumor tissue appeared not to be mediated by specific immunoglobulins (enhancement), since repeated injections about the time of challenge with serum from tumor-carrying mice or from hyperimmunized mice did not impair resistance.

1 This work was supported in part by USPHS Grants CA05047, CA11138, CA6294, and CA11430.

2 Present address: Department of Radiation Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. 02114.

Received 4/29/71. Accepted 10/ 7/71.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1972 by the American Association for Cancer Research.