Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 32, 522-526, March 1, 1972]
© 1972 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grindey, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nichol, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grindey, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nichol, C. A.

Evaluation of Combination Chemotherapy in Vivo and in Culture with 1-ß-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine and 1-Formylisoquinoline Thiosemicarbazone1

Gerald B. Grindey, Enrico Mihich and Charles A. Nichol2

Department of Experimental Therapeutics, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, New York State Department of Health, Buffalo, New York 14203

Combinations of 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine and 1-formylisoquinoline thiosemicarbazone resulted in synergistic effects against leukemia L1210 in DBA/2Ha-DD mice. Data obtained in irradiated DBA/2Ha-DD mice, in DBA/2J mice, and in cell cultures indicated that these combinations actually have only additive inhibitory effects against the leukemia L1210 cells. These results indicate that a drug combination with only additive inhibitory effects on tumor cell growth can cause therapeutic synergism in vivo due to the participation of host defenses directed against the tumor.

1 This investigation was supported in part by USPHS Research Grant CA-11047. The work reported herein was submitted by G. B. Grindey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree in a cooperative program between the Program of Pharmacology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Division of the Graduate School, and the Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo. A graduate fellowship from the New York State Department of Health supported G. B. Grindey.

2 Present address: Wellcome Research Laboratories, 3030 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27709.

Received 7/13/71. Accepted 12/ 3/71.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
Y. Matloub, S. Lindemulder, P. S. Gaynon, H. Sather, M. La, E. Broxson, R. Yanofsky, R. Hutchinson, N. A. Heerema, J. Nachman, et al.
Intrathecal triple therapy decreases central nervous system relapse but fails to improve event-free survival when compared with intrathecal methotrexate: results of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1952 study for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, reported by the Children's Oncology Group
Blood, August 15, 2006; 108(4): 1165 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1972 by the American Association for Cancer Research.