Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 33, 2721-2725, November 1, 1973]
© 1973 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mott, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sorof, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mott, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sorof, S.

The Content of the Principal Protein Target of a Hepatic Carcinogen in Liver Tumors1

David M. Mott, Brahma P. Sani and Sam Sorof

The Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Center for Cancer and Medical Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111

It has been variously suggested that chemical carcinogens interact with a protein regulator of cell growth, ultimately causing neoplastic cells to arise in which the protein target of the carcinogen is reduced or absent. As a test of the target reduction aspect of these hypotheses, the amount of the principal protein target of a hepatic carcinogen was determined immunologically in liver tumors caused by that carcinogen.

Specific antiserum against the principal liver protein target of a hepatic azocarcinogen was obtained by immunization with the highly purified liver azoprotein isolated from rats fed 3'-methyl-4-dimethylaminoazobenzene for 15 to 18 days. The amount of the target protein in serially diluted liver and liver tumor cytosols was measured by gel double immunodiffusion with a precision of 10% (S.D.) or less.

Little difference in the relative content of the principal target protein was found in the liver cytosols of normal rats and of those fed a diet containing or lacking the azocarcinogen for 15 to 18 days. In contrast, in 15 cytosols of primary liver tumors of 15 rats fed the azocarcinogen until sacrifice, the content of protein target of azocarcinogen was 6 to 31% (average, 18 ± 8% S.D.) of that present in normal rat liver cytosol. In 7 cytosols of livers around tumors, the quantity of target protein was 66 to 116% (average, 83 ± 19% S.D.).

An additional series of assays examined 4 types of transplanted hepatomas that were originally caused by fluorenyl amide and biphenyl amide carcinogens. These carcinogens probably have principal target proteins that are different from those of azocarcinogens. Three kinds of well-differentiated hepatomas had mean levels (85 to 98%) of the protein target of azocarcinogens like that of normal liver. One type of poorly differentiated hepatoma had < 3%.

The finding of a reduction in amount of principal protein target of a carcinogen in primary tumors caused by that carcinogen, and not in transplanted differentiated tumors caused by other carcinogens, suggests two alternatives, namely, either the reduction need be specifically that of the target protein of the carcinogen which caused the neoplasm or it is due to other causes, e.g., tumor progression, and therefore is not essential for neoplasia per se. These alternatives are separate from the more basic question of the role (if any) of the carcinogen-protein interaction in chemical carcinogenesis, possibly as part of a mechanism not involving target protein depletion in tumors.

1 Supported in part by Grants CA-05945, CA-06927, and RR-05539 from the NIH and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Received 6/14/73. Accepted 8/ 9/73.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. A. Loeb and C. C. Harris
Advances in Chemical Carcinogenesis: A Historical Review and Prospective
Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 6863 - 6872.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1973 by the American Association for Cancer Research.