Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 33, 493-503, March 1, 1973]
© 1973 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaage, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaage, J.

Influence of Tumor Antigen on Maintenance versus Depression of Tumor-specific Immunity1

Jan Vaage

Department of Radiation Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114

The development of immunity to tumor-specific transplantation antigens has been studied with a syngeneic methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma. Of several immunization procedures tested, live tumor implantation followed by resection gave the strongest immune resistance to challenge implantation of tumor cells. The immune resistance persisted with only slight decline for at least 100 days after the sensitizing tumor was cured by surgery or irradiation. If the sensitizing tumor was left in situ past a size of about 7 to 8 mm diameter, the immune resistance of the host declined rapidly but was not abrogated. The depression was related to the size of the sensitizing tumor present at the time of challenge and could be maintained by a residual small tumor mass or by injections of killed tumor cells after a large tumor had been removed. The recovery of immune resistance following the cure of a large tumor was more rapid if the mice were cured by excision than if the mice were cured by local radiotherapy. Depression of immune resistance by injection of killed tumor cells was not seen early in the immune response or 3 weeks after resection of a sensitizing tumor, nor was depression seen at any time if the mice were challenged i.v. The injection of suspensions of killed tumor cells appeared to boost the level of immune resistance, which was in slight decline when it was tested from 20 to 101 days after the removal of a sensitizing primary tumor.

1 This work was supported by USPHS Grants CA6294, CA11138, and CA13018 and by a Cancer Research Scholar Award from the American Cancer Society, Massachusetts Division, Inc.

Received 9/14/72. Accepted 11/28/72.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1973 by the American Association for Cancer Research.