Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 34, 181-183, January 1, 1974]
© 1974 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, M. S.

Effect of Imidazole-4-carboxamide, 5-(3,3-Dimethyl-1-triazeno) on Immunity in Patients with Malignant Melanoma1

Howard W. Bruckner2, Margalit Birnbaum Mokyr and Malcolm S. Mitchell3

Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Imidazole-4-carboxamide, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno), NSC 45388 (DTIC), was administered for 5 consecutive days as a rapid 150-mg/sq m or 250-mg/sq m infusion to 13 patients with melanoma. DTIC did not interfere with induction of a cellular immune (delayed hypersensitivity) response to dinitrochlorobenzene in 7 of 12 patients tested or with established delayed hypersensitivity reactions in 8 of 8 patients. The 5 nonresponders to dinitrochlorobenzene were unable to manifest a cellular immune response to skin test antigens even before treatment with DTIC. DTIC did not suppress the primary humoral response to Vi antigen in 7 of 12 patients. The secondary response to tetanus toxoid was normal in 5 of 7 patients. These results indicate that DTIC at these dosage schedules was only moderately immunosuppressive and inhibited humoral immune responses slightly more than the cellular responses tested.

1 Supported by USPHS Research Grants CA 08341 and CA 13105 and American Cancer Society Grant IC-72.

2 Recipient of USPHS Special Fellowship IF-3, Grant CA 51650-01, and American Cancer Society Grant PF 826.

3 Scholar of the Leukemia Society of America. To whom reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Medicine, Yale University, School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, Conn.

Received 6/ 1/73. Accepted 10/11/73.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Garbe, P. Radny, R. Linse, R. Dummer, R. Gutzmer, J. Ulrich, R. Stadler, M. Weichenthal, TK. Eigentler, U. Ellwanger, et al.
Adjuvant low-dose interferon {alpha}2a with or without dacarbazine compared with surgery alone: a prospective-randomized phase III DeCOG trial in melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1195 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. S. Mitchell
Chemotherapy for Melanoma: The Resultant of Conflicting Vectors
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2043 - 2045.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1974 by the American Association for Cancer Research.