Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  09 AM Call for Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 34, 27-30, January 1, 1974]
© 1974 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahmann, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahmann, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, R. G.

A Phase 2 Evaluation of 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-(4- methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea (NSC 95441) in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer1

David L. Ahmann, Harry F. Bisel and Richard G. Hahn

Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55901

A program utilizing 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea (methyl-CCNU) (NSC 95441) at a dosage of 225 mg/sq m p.o. on Day 1 was contrasted with a combination program utilizing 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone with or without vincristine in 43 patients with disseminated breast cancer. Prior to randomization patients were stratified according to dominant disease, free interval, and menstrual category. If the initial treatment failed, a cross-over assignment to the alternate treatment program was made. One of 22 patients responded to methyl-CCNU as primary therapy, contrasting with 7 of 11 responding to the combination program without vincristine and 5 of 10 to the combination program with vincristine. On cross-over, thus far, none have responded to methyl-CCNU but one-third have responded to the combination program. Toxic effects included gastrointestinal upset in 10 of 30 patients who took methyl-CCNU and in 28 of 38 who received the combination programs. Myelosuppression (leukocyte count less than 3000/cu mm of blood) occurred in 13 of 30 patients given methyl-CCNU and in 29 of 38 patients given the combination programs. Platelets were suppressed in 8 of 30 patients by methyl-CCNU and in 10 of 38 patients by the multiple-drug programs. Neurological complications were limited to the group treated with vincristine, in which 17 of 20 patients had peripheral neuropathies. Alopecia was confined to the multiple-treatment group of patients.

1 This investigation was supported in part by Research Contract 71-2185 from the NIH, USPHS.

Received 6/29/73. Accepted 10/ 1/73.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1974 by the American Association for Cancer Research.