Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 34, 1600-1607, July 1, 1974]
© 1974 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Heidelberger, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Heidelberger, C.

Cell Cycle Dependency of DNA Damage and Repair in Transformable Mouse Fibroblasts Treated with N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine1

A. R. Peterson, John S. Bertram and Charles Heidelberger2

McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, The Medical School, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Alkaline sucrose sedimentation procedures were used to study the repair of DNA damage induced by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) over the range of doses that were from 10 to 99% lethal in transformable mouse fibroblasts (C3H/10T1/2 CL8 cells), which were synchronized by arginine deprivation. Repair occurred at a rapid rate in cells treated 4 hr before (I) or shortly after (II) the commencement of DNA synthesis. However, in cells treated when DNA synthesis was blocked (III), no repair could be detected until after the block was released. By contrast, II was most sensitive, while I and III were equally sensitive to lethality induced by MNNG. Furthermore, the previously demonstrated peak of oncogenic transformation produced by MNNG occurred in I, whereas II, which exhibited an equally rapid rate of repair, was not transformed so readily. It was concluded that in this system there is no direct correlation between DNA repair, as measured by alkaline sucrose sedimentation, and susceptibility to transformation or lethality produced by MNNG.

1 This work was supported in part by Grant CA 7175 from the National Cancer Institute, NIH, and Grant BC-2C from the American Cancer Society.

2 American Cancer Society Professor of Oncology.

Received 12/ 3/73. Accepted 3/11/74.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1974 by the American Association for Cancer Research.