Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 35, 2619-2630, October 1, 1975]
© 1975 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valeriote, F.
Right arrow Articles by van Putten, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valeriote, F.
Right arrow Articles by van Putten, L.

Proliferation-dependent Cytotoxicity of Anticancer Agents: A Review1

Frederick Valeriote

Luke van Putten

Section of Cancer Biology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Mailinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 [F. V.], and Radiobiological Institute TNO, 151 Lange Kleiweg, Rijswijk (ZH), The Netherlands [L. V.]

One of the factors of importance in determining the killing of mammalian cells following exposure to a variety of anticancer agents is the proliferative state of the cell population. Generally, proliferating cells are much more sensitive to anticancer agents than are nonproliferating cells. In this review, the cellular aspects of this differential sensitivity are discussed with the hemopoietic stem cell population and tissue culture cells as the focus for the analysis. This phenomenon is not only of concern to the cell biologist but also has implications with regard to scheduling of anticancer agents against human tumors.

1 This work was supported by USPHS Grant CA-13053 from the National Cancer Institute and was part of a program of the EORTC Screening and Pharmacology Group.

Received 2/24/75. Accepted 5/22/75.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
F. Di Nicolantonio, L. A. Knight, P. A. Whitehouse, S. J. Mercer, S. Sharma, P. A. Charlton, D. Norris, and I. A. Cree
The ex vivo characterization of XR5944 (MLN944) against a panel of human clinical tumor samples
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2004; 3(12): 1631 - 1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. H. Wilson, J. Teruya-Feldstein, T. Fest, C. Harris, S. M. Steinberg, E. S. Jaffe, and M. Raffeld
Relationship of p53, bcl-2, and Tumor Proliferation to Clinical Drug Resistance in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas
Blood, January 15, 1997; 89(2): 601 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1975 by the American Association for Cancer Research.