Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 35, 2699-2703, October 1, 1975]
© 1975 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, R. C.

Failure to Detect Anti-Group-specific Murine Leukemia Virus Activity in Tetraparental AKR-CBA Chimeras

Ronald D. Barnes, Maureen A. Tuffrey and Rachel C. Bourne

Clinical Research Centre, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, England

Tetraparental AKR-CBA/H-T6 chimeras were primarily derived and investigated to determine whether factors associated with the tumor resistance of the CBA/H-T6 could overcome the innate lymphoma susceptibility of the AKR. Evidence has since shown that, on comparison with the AKR, lymphomas were not only delayed but were also less common in a group of 18 early embryo aggregation-derived AKR-CBA/H-T6 tetraparental chimeras.

Evidence here has shown other clear differences between the AKR and AKR-CBA/H-T6 chimeras. Whereas murine group-specific murine leukemia viral antigens were detected in the sera in both situations, immunoabsorption studies showed that, in the AKR, the antigens exist complexed to the corresponding antibodies. The situation in the chimeras was in complete contrast, since here antigens exist as a "free" form. This in turn has led us to suggest that the advantage in respect to tumor immunity in the AKR-CBA/H-T6 chimeras is due to the tolerance to oncogenic virus being maintained. In this situation and in contrast to the AKR, in the absence of "masking" antibody-viral antigenic complexes, "normal" tumor immunity can be effected. It has to be assumed that tolerance to the oncogenic Gross virus in the AKR-CBA/H-T6 chimeras reflects the influence of the CBA component. How this has possibly been achieved is discussed.

Received 2/24/75. Accepted 6/25/75.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1975 by the American Association for Cancer Research.