Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 35, 3320-3325, November 1, 1975]
© 1975 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vitale, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vitale, J. J.

Possible Role of Nutrients in Neoplasia1

Joseph J. Vitale

Department of Pathology, Boston University School of Medicine, Mallory Institute of Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts 02118

The relationship between cancer and diet is supported by epidemiological evidence suggesting that diet is a factor in the development of cancer of various organs including the esophagues, stomach, liver, and large bowel. The role of depressed immunocompetency, especially during critical periods of growth and development, is stressed as a possible important consequence of nutritional insults leading to carcinoma. Study of the relationships among nutritional factors, host-defense mechanisms, and carcinogens to carcinogenesis is significant since, theoretically, manipulation of diet could suppress or prevent chemically induced cancers. The distinction should be emphasized, however, between "nutrients," those elements of one's intake that are essential because the body is unable to synthesize them de novo, and "diet," which refers to everything that is ingested. It is the components of diet, chemicals in particular, that are most convincingly implicated as carcinogens, while it is doubtful that nutrient deficiencies or excesses have a direct causal relationship with the onset or development of cancer. Rather, nutrition probably exerts it carinogenic effects indirectly; nutrients possibly enhance chemical carcinogenesis multifactorially by mechanisms linked to their ability to: (a) act as carriers of carcinogens or their precursors; (b) alter intestinal flora so that carcinogenic reactions are facilitated; (c) enhance levels and reactivity of cocarcinogens; (d) influence absorptive properties or morphology of tissues so that carcinogenic activity is enhanced; and/or (e) modify host-defense mechanisms that normally protect that organism.

1 Presented at the Conference on Nutrition in the Causation of Cancer, May 19 to 22, 1975, Key giscayne, Fla. Supported by Grants AA0-23 from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, CA 16750 from the National Cancer Institute, 3057-41 from the General Research Support, Boston City Hospital, 508 from the Nutrition Foundation, Inc., and Contract HSM-42-72-195 from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1975 by the American Association for Cancer Research.