Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 35, 521-527, March 1, 1975]
© 1975 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andoh, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kawazoe, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andoh, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kawazoe, Y.

Breakage of a DNA-Protein Complex Induced by 4-Nitroquinoline 1-Oxide, 4-Nitropyridine 1-Oxide, and Their Derivatives in Cultured Mouse Fibroblasts

Toshiwo Andoh, Toshinori Ide, Morihiko Saito and Yutaka Kawazoe

Department of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Shirokanedai 4-6-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108 [T. A., T. I., M. S.]; and Chemotherapy Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104 [Y. K.], Japan

The effects of a number of 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide and 4-nitropyridine 1-oxide derivatives, with varying carcinogenic potencies, on the scission of proteins linking DNA were studied in cultured mouse fibroblasts, strain L·P3. With twenty-two 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide derivatives and twelve 4-nitropyridine 1-oxide derivatives tested, an excellent correlation was found between the scission effect of each compound and its carcinogenicity. All carcinogens, whether strong or weak, showed positive results in the scission test. Strong carcinogens such as 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 2-methyl-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 6-methyl-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 6-chloro-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, and 4-hydroxyaminoquinoline 1-oxide induced the scission at a low concentration of 1 x 10-5 M, while weak carcinogens such as 3-methyl-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 6-n-butyl-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 6-tert-butyl-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 6-n-hexyl-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, and 6-carboxy-4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide only produced the same effect at dose levels higher than 5 x 10-5 M. On the other hand, some noncarcinogenic derivatives such as 8-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 4-hydroxy-quinoline 1-oxide, 4-aminoquinoline 1-oxide, and 6-nitroquinoline could not induce the scission, while other noncarcinogens such as 3-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 5-nitroquinoline l-oxide, and 5-nitroquinoline did induce scission at concentrations higher than 1 x 10-4 M. Throughout these tests the effective concentrations of active compounds were generally much lower than the concentration at which the compounds were cytotoxic.

The implication of the results and the feasibility of the present method of analysis as a screening procedure for potential carcinogens and mutagens are discussed.

Received 1/ 2/74. Accepted 10/ 8/74.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1975 by the American Association for Cancer Research.