Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 36, 753-758, February 1, 1976]
© 1976 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heppner, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Medina, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heppner, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Medina, D.

Microcytotoxicity Assay of Immune Responses to Non-Mammary Tumor Virus-induced, Preneoplastic, and Neoplastic Mammary Lesions in BALB/c Mice1

G. H. Heppner2, J. S. Kopp and D. Medina

Department of Medicine, Roger Williams General Hospital and Division of Biological and Medical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02908 [G. H. H.], and Department of Cell Biology, Baylor University School of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77025 [J. S. K., D. M.]

Using a microcytotoxicity assay we have studied the immune responses to the preneoplastic, hyperplastic alveolar nodule (HAN) lines D1 and D2 and to the mammary tumors arising spontaneously from them in BALB/c mice. Lymph node cells (LNC) from mice bearing HAN implants, or from mice whose implants had been removed >1 week prior to testing, failed significantly to inhibit survival of HAN cells in culture. Specific inhibition of HAN cells was found, however, in 9 of 28 experiments with LNC from mice whose implants had been removed within the week of testing, and not with LNC from sham-operated controls. On the other hand, increased survival of HAN cells was also seen with LNC from sensitized, as opposed to normal, mice. This was more frequent for tests with D1 than with D2 HAN cells (38 versus 9%) and when the LNC donors were still bearing HAN implants (60% of tests versus 27% when implants removed).

Following sensitization by implantation and subsequent removal of D1 or D2 tumors, LNC-mediated inhibition of tumor cell survival, specific for each tumor, was found in about 25% of the tests. Increased survival of tumor cells, however, was seen in 30 to 40% of the tests. This increased survival cross-reacted between D1 and D2 tumors and between D1–D2 and mammary tumor virus-induced tumors, but not between D1–D2 and chemically induced mammary tumors or fibrosarcomas. Increased survival could be blocked by sera from sensitized mice.

In contrast to mammary tumor virus-induced mammary lesions, the Immune responses to D1 and D2 HAN lines and tumors are "weak" and indeed perhaps stimulate hyperplastic and neoplastic cell survival.

1 Presented at the symposium "Immunological Control of Virus-associated Tumors in Man: Prospects and Problems," April 7 to 9, 1975, Bethesda, d. This work supported by USPHS Grants GM 16538-05, CA-11944, CA-13261, CA 10893, M1-P02-13943-01 and CA 17074.

2 Presenter.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Association for Cancer Research.