Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 36, 2312-2316, July 1, 1976]
© 1976 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maness, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Orengo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maness, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Orengo, A.

Differences between Pyrimidine Nucleoside Monophosphate Kinase from Rat Novikoff Ascites Hepatoma and Rat Liver1

Patricia F. Maness2 and Antonio Orengo3

Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas System Cancer Center, M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston, Texas 77030

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Pyrimidine nucleoside monophosphate kinase [deoxycytidine monophosphate:adenosine triphosphate (dCMP:ATP) phosphotransferase, EC 2.7.4.14] has been purified from rat Novikoff ascites hepatoma and rat liver, each to a single major band appearing on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Differences exist in regard to efficiency and regulation of enzymatic activities. The Km values of the tumor kinase for cytidine monophosphate (CMP) (0.0053 ± 0.0008 mM) and dCMP (0.715 ± 0.068 mM) are approximately one-fourth the Km values of the rat liver kinase, for CMP (0.030 ± 0.007 mM) and dCMP (2.77 ± 0.39 mM). The tumor dCMP kinase exhibits a lower Km for ATP (0.134 ± 0.008 mM) than the rat liver kinase (0.68 ± 0.09 mM). Moreover, the dCMP:CMP kinase activity ratio for the tumor enzyme is 1.12, while that for the rat liver enzyme is 0.45. The uridine monophosphate:CMP kinase activity ratio for the tumor enzyme is 1.93, while that for the rat liver enzyme is 2.68.

Lower concentrations of dithiothreitol are required for 50% reactivation of the tumor dCMP kinase (1.00 mM) and CMP kinase (0.10 mM) than rat liver dCMP kinase (2.20 mM) and CMP kinase (0.57 mM). Thus, the kinase from Novikoff hepatoma exhibits properties of increased efficiency and relaxed regulation of activity which render it more suitable for a tumor, in which active DNA synthesis is ongoing.

1 This research was supported by USPHS Grant CA-10407 and by Research Grant G-460 from the Robert A. Welch Foundation.

2 Rosalie B. Hite Postdoctoral Fellow.

Received 2/17/76. Accepted 4/ 8/76.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Association for Cancer Research.