This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fisher, B. Articles by Wolmark, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fisher, B. Articles by Wolmark, N.

The Effect of Corynebacterium parvum in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil, L-Phenylalanine Mustard, or Methotrexate on the Inhibition of Tumor Growth¹

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

Previous reports from this laboratory have demonstrated conclusively that cyclophosphamide administered asynchronously with Corynebacterium parvum (CP) results in greater C3H mammary tumor inhibition than that observed with either agent alone. An analysis of this combination has revealed that the chemotherapeutic component contributes more significantly to tumor inhibition than does the immunotherapeutic one.

This study was conducted to investigate the inhibition of C3H mammary tumors by other chemotherapeutic agents when used with CP. The results have demonstrated that 60 mg of cyclophosphamide per kg, 90 mg of 5-fluorouracil per kg, and 10 mg of L-phenylalanine mustard per kg administered weekly have similar tumor-inhibiting properties. The addition of CP enhanced the tumor-inhibiting properties of each agent but to differing degrees. The effect of the immunopotentiator when used in combination with alkylating agents was greater than that seen when it was used with the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil. The tumor inhibition observed when cyclophosphamide was administered asynchronously with CP was significantly greater than that observed when L-phenylalanine mustard was similarly used. Of particular interest was the finding that the addition of CP to a combination of chemotherapeutic agents resulted in no greater tumor growth inhibition than that which occurred when CP was used along with the most effective single agent in the combination. The data have indicated that, contrary to clinical impression, there is no evidence that CP through its toxicity-sparing effect permits the utilization of larger doses of chemotherapy. Consideration has been given to the mechanisms that might account for the differences in tumor growth inhibition encountered when CP was used with different chemotherapeutic agents.

¹ Supported by USPHS Grants CA 14972, CA 12102, and CA 13289.

Received 11/13/75. Accepted 4/12/76.