Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 37, 3863-3868, November 1, 1977]
© 1977 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mantel, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ciminera, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mantel, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ciminera, J. L.

Mantel-Haenszel Analyses of Litter-matched Time-to-Response Data, with Modifications for Recovery of Interlitter Information

Nathan Mantel1, Neeti R. Bohidar and Joseph L. Ciminera

Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Bethesda, Maryland 20014 [N. M.], and Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486 [N. R. B. J. L. C.]

The Mantel-Haenszel procedure for comparing sets of time-to-response data is adaptable to data that can be stratified on other variables. A particular adaptation, which we have used, is one in which animals from the same litter have been assigned to different treatment groups, e.g., some to a control group and some to a drug treatment group. The time to response used was that of tumor appearance; death from other causes was considered a loss to observation. The initial litter-adjusted analysis seemed to have only limited advantages compared to analysis that ignored litters and could be interpreted as suggesting that litter matching was not advantageous. Contributing to the difficulty was the fact that in the litter-matched analysis no further information was forthcoming from the remaining similarly treated animals in a litter when there were no remaining contrastingly treated littermates. Several devices for recovering interlitter information from such remnants and for combining it with intralitter information are examined and applied.

1 This work was supported by USPHS Grant CA-15686 from the National Cancer Institute.

Received 3/10/77. Accepted 8/ 2/77.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
W. Jiang, Z. Zhu, J. N. McGinley, and H. J. Thompson
Adrenalectomy Does Not Block the Inhibition of Mammary Carcinogenesis by Dietary Energy Restriction in Rats
J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1152 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Association for Cancer Research.