This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shils, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shils, M. E.

Enteral Nutrition by Tube¹

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York 10021

When p.o. intake is unsatisfactory or contraindicated, maintenance of nutrition by tube feeding is an alternative to the i.v. route. A number of factors will enter into the decision as to which alternative is better. In general, it is desirable to utilize the alimentary tract if it is functioning adequately. The potential hazard of aspiration and problems in inserting the tube into the appropriate part of the tract may offset advantages of tube feeding. The composition of the formula to be administered will depend upon the functional state of the gastrointestinal tract and the metabolic needs of the patient. Defined-formula diets have become commercially available for p.o. and tube feeding. These are both a boon and a problem to patient, physician, and dietitian. They simplify ordering, storage, preparation, and administration, but they have drawbacks related to their fixed composition. The large number of diverse formulations require expertise for their proper use.

Entry of food into the alimentary tract is a stimulus to maintenance of structure and function of that tract and to hyperplasia when resection of bowel has occurred. Special formulations and modifications in route and rate of feeding may be beneficial in meeting the needs of patients with pancreatic insufficiency, malabsorption of various etiology, fistulas, and organ failures that modify nutritional requirements. Consideration should be given to adjunctive chemotherapy during nutritional rehabilitation of patients with known or suspected tumor.

¹ Presented at the Conference on Nutrition and Cancer Therapy, November 29 to December 1, 1976, Key Biscayne, Fla.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Viall, K. Porcelli, J. C. Teran, R. N. Varma, and W. P. Steffee A Double-Blind Clinical Trial Comparing the Gastrointestinal Side Effects of Two Enteral Feeding Formulas JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1990; 14(3): 265 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. L. Breach and L. G. Saldanha Tube Feedings: A Survey of Compliance To Procedures and Complications Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 1988; 3(6): 230 - 234. [PDF]

				K.R. Anderson, D.J. Norris, L.B. Godfrey, C. K. Avent, and C.E. Butterworth JR Bacterial Contamination of Tube-Feeding Formulas JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 1984; 8(6): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. E. Hearne, P. M. Besser, S. Groshen, and J. M. Daly In Vitro Flow Rates of Enteral Solutions through Nasoenteric Tubes JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 1984; 8(4): 456 - 459. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. S. Donaldson Nutritional Support as an Adjunct to Radiation Therapy JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1984; 8(3): 302 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. Cataldi-Betcher, M. H. Seltzer, B. A. Slocum, and K. W. Jones Complications Occurring during Enteral Nutrition Support: A Prospective Study JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 1983; 7(6): 546 - 552. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. Young, L. A. Cioletti, J. B. Traylor, and V. Balderas Gastrointestinal Response to Nutrient Variation of Defined Formula Diets JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 1981; 5(6): 478 - 484. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. Heitkemper, D. L. Martin, B. C. Hansen, R. Hanson, and V. Vanderburg Rate and Volume of Intermittent Enteral Feeding JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 1981; 5(2): 125 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. GREMILLION JR. Simple Method for Passage of Small-Bore Nasogastric Feeding Catheter Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1979; 91(4): 655 - 656. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. HEYMSFIELD, R. A. BETHEL, J. D. ANSLEY, D. W. NIXON, and D. RUDMAN Enteral Hyperalimentation: An Alternative to Central Venous Hyperalimentation Ann Intern Med, January 1, 1979; 90(1): 63 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]