Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 38, 4001-4005, November 1, 1978]
© 1978 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, R. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, R. I.

A Critique of the Statistical Evidence Associating Estrogens with Endometrial Cancer1

Alvan R. Feinstein and Ralph I. Horwitz

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

The epidemiological problem of detection bias occurs when the evidence needed to diagnose a particular disease is sought more intensively in the group of people exposed to a particular agent than in the comparative group, who did not receive the agent. The bias can occur during community surveillance before hospitalization, during the ordering of diagnostic tests for hospitalized patients, or during the interpretation of the tests.

In postmenopausal women with endometrial cancer, detection bias is produced because of the dilation and curettage (or other diagnostic tests) ordered when bleeding occurs as a side effect of estrogen therapy. In estrogen takers, these diagnostic explorations allow the detection of endometrial cancers that might otherwise be silent and undetected in women who do not take estrogen.

Since this bias occurs before patients are hospitalized, its removal requires special sampling and analytic techniques that have not been used in most epidemiological case-control studies where high risk ratios were found for the association between estrogens and endometrial cancer. When cases and controls have been selected with the use of a diagnostic procedure as the sampling frame, the odds ratios are much closer to 1; with appropriate stratification for the diagnostic stimulus of bleeding, the odds ratios approximate 1.

Other sources of bias for the estrogen-endometrial cancer association can be the "protopathic" prescription of estrogen for women with unrecognized endometrial cancer, the absence of "double-blind" interviewing techniques, and arbitrary definitions of "exposure to estrogens."

The difficulties in interpreting the relationship of estrogens and endometrial cancer indicate the need for development of rigorous scientific standards in the epidemiological methods used for case-control research.

1 Presented at the John E. Fogarty International Center Conference on Hormones and Cancer, March 29 to 31, 1978, Bethesda, Md.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1978 by the American Association for Cancer Research.