Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 38, 2391-2394, August 1, 1978]
© 1978 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lijinsky, W.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lijinsky, W.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. W.

Relative Carcinogenic Effectiveness of Derivatives of Nitrosodiethylamine in Rats1

W. Lijinsky2,3 and H. Wayne Taylor4

The Carcinogenesis Program, Biology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

The carcinogenicity of five derivatives of nitrosodiethylamine was compared with that of the parent compound by p.o. administration to rats. All were less potent than was nitrosodiethylamine. When nitrosobis(2-methyoxyethyl)amine and nitrosobis(2-ethoxyethyl)amine were administered at equimolar doses in drinking water, there was a high incidence of liver tumors, but the animals died later than they did after nitrosodiethylamine treatment, which also induced esophageal tumors. Nitrosoiminodipropionitrile and nitrosobis(2,2-diethoxyethyl)amine failed to induce tumors at the same dose level. Nitrosobis(2-chloroethyl)amine was administered in oil by gavage at a dose lower than that of nitrosodiethylamine and produced a much weaker tumor response; 5 of 15 treated rats had forestomach papillomas, and 1 had olfactory adenocarcinoma and no other induced tumors.

1 Supported by the National Cancer Institute and the Energy Research and Development Administration under contract with Union Carbide Corporation.

2 Present address: Chemical Carcinogenesis Program, Frederick Cancer Research Center, Frederick, Md. 21701.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at Chemical Carcinogenesis Program, Frederick Cancer Research Center, Frederick, Md. 21701.

4 Present address: School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La. 70803.

Received 11/10/77. Accepted 4/24/78.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1978 by the American Association for Cancer Research.