Cancer Research 09 AM Call for Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 39, 3018-3023, August 1, 1979]
© 1979 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wotring, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wotring, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, L. B.

Study of the Cytotoxicity and Metabolism of 4-Amino-3-carboxamido-1-(ß-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine Using Inhibitors of Adenosine Kinase and Adenosine Deaminase1

Linda L. Wotring2 and Leroy B. Townsend3

Departments of Biochemical Pharmacology and Toxicology [L. L. W.] and Medicinal Chemistry [L. B. T.], College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

The greater in vivo antitumor activity of 4-amino-3-carboxamido-1-(ß-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (APPCR) in comparison to the parent compound 4-amino-1-(ß-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (APPR) may involve intrinsic differences in the effects of these two compounds on cells, as well as in their metabolisms. In studies with L1210 cells in vitro, growth inhibition by APPCR for 36 hr or more was found to be cytocidal, while growth inhibition by APPR was cytostatic in that a substantial fraction of the cells survived 36 or 72 hr of exposure to growth-inhibiting concentrations of APPR. It appears that this difference in the cellular effects of APPCR and APPR is not related to differences in the requirement for activation by phosphorylation or in susceptibility to inactivation by deamination. However, deamination may limit the effectiveness of APPR in vivo since it is a substrate for adenosine deaminase, while deamination of APPCR is not detectable.

1 This work was supported by Contracts N01-CM-43806 and NCI-CM-77142 from the Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, NIH. A portion of this material has been reported previously in abstract form (26).

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at College of Pharmacy, 1010 Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109.

3 Present address: Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109.

Received 11/10/78. Accepted 4/26/79.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1979 by the American Association for Cancer Research.