Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 40, 3437-3442, October 1, 1980]
© 1980 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhuyan, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Shugars, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhuyan, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Shugars, K. D.

Lethality of Nogalamycin, Nogalamycin Analogs, and Adriamycin to Cells in Different Cell Cycle Phases1

Bijoy K. Bhuyan2, Constance L. Blowers and Kathleen D. Shugars

Cancer Research, The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001

The drugs studied included nogalamycin and its derivative 7-con-O-methylnogalarol, dis-nogamycin and its derivative 7-con-O-methylnogarol, and Adriamycin. All of these drugs, especially at high doses, were lethal to cells in every phase of the cell cycle, indicating that they were not phase specific. However, there were significant differences in drug sensitivity of cells in different parts of the cell cycle.

Nogalamycin and Adriamycin were most lethal to the cells in S phase, whereas cells in M, G1, and G2 were much less sensitive. In contrast, the nogalamycin derivative 7-con-O-methylnogalarol was almost equally lethal to cells in all phases of the cell cycle.

dis-nogamycin was most lethal to cells in postmetaphase and in early S phase. Cells in mid- and late G1, late S, and G2 were much less sensitive.

The pattern of sensitivity of 7-con-O-methylnogarol was different from that of dis-nogamycin. 7-con-O-Methylnogarol was most lethal to cells in early G1, S, and G2. Only cells in mid- and late G1 were much less sensitive to this drug.

1 This study was supported in part by Contract NO1-CM-43753, Division of Cancer Treatment, NCI, NIH, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 8/29/79. Accepted 6/19/80.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1980 by the American Association for Cancer Research.