| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68105
7-Methylguanine was found in hydrolysates of liver and pancreas DNA from Syrian golden hamsters given a single dose of N-[1-14C]nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine (BOP). This led us to examine the carcinogenicity of a potential methylating metabolite of BOP, N-nitrosomethyl(2-oxopropyl)amine (MOP). MOP was found to be a potent pancreatic carcinogen by either single or weekly s.c. injections. A single MOP treatment (25 mg/kg body weight) induced ductular adenomas and/or adenocarcinomas in 80% of the hamsters. A higher incidence of these neoplasms was found in 93% and 87% of animals receiving, respectively, 3.5 and 1.75 mg MOP per kg body weight weekly for life. However, the lower dose (0.87 mg/kg body weight) was less effective, resulting in a 33% tumor incidence. Compared with the known potent pancreatic carcinogen BOP, MOP seemed to have a greater affinity for the pancreas since considerably lower doses were required to induce similar incidences of equivalent pancreatic tumors. Like BOP, MOP caused tumors of the liver (7 to 100% incidence), kidneys (7 to 80% incidence), and vascular system (7 to 27% incidence). However, in contrast to BOP, which was noncarcinogenic to the upper respiratory tract, MOP-treated animals developed a high incidence of nasal cavity tumors (40% after a single treatment and 27 to 100% after weekly injections). The mutagenesis studies using hamster liver cell-mediated V79 cells confirmed the stronger effect of MOP compared to BOP. The assumption that MOP might be a proximate carcinogenic metabolite of BOP could not be substantiated by our methods for determining the in vivo and in vitro metabolites of BOP.
1 Supported by Grant NO1-R26-CA-20198 from the National Cancer Institute National Pancreatic Cancer Project and NIH Contract NO1-CP-33278 from the National Cancer Institute.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
Received 10/29/79. Accepted 7/ 2/80.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Tascilar, B P van Rees, P D J Sturm, G N J Tytgat, R H Hruban, S N Goodman, F M Giardiello, G J A Offerhaus, and A C Tersmette Pancreatic cancer after remote peptic ulcer surgery J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2002; 55(5): 340 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |