Cancer Research SABCS  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 40, 4415-4419, December 1, 1980]
© 1980 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parshad, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grier, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parshad, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grier, A. H.

Susceptibility to Fluorescent Light-induced Chromatid Breaks Associated with DNA Repair Deficiency and Malignant Transformation in Culture

Ram Parshad, Katherine K. Sanford1, Gary M. Jones, Robert E. Tarone, Harold A. Hoffman and Alice H. Grier

Department of Pathology, Howard University, College of Medicine, Washington, D. C. 20059 [R. P.]; Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, [K. K. S., G. M. J.] and Biometry Branch [R. E. T.], National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20205; and Veterinary Resources Branch, Division of Research Services, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20205 [H. A. H., A. H. G.]

The increased susceptibility of mouse cells to fluorescent light-induced chromatid damage following their spontaneous malignant transformation in culture could result from loss or inactivation of catalase that decomposes the photoproduct H2O2 or from impaired capacities to repair DNA damage. No consistent change in catalase activity with respect to neoplastic state could be established. To interpret the cytogenetic damage in terms of DNA strand breaks, we determined the incidence of chromatid breaks induced by light exposure during the G1 and late S-G2 phases of the cell cycle in normal and malignant derivatives of a C3H mouse cell line. Chromatid breaks at metaphase following light exposure during G1 would result from DNA strand breaks, cross-links, or base damage, whereas breaks following exposure during late S-G2 would result from single- or double-strand breaks. Both G1 and late S-G2 were susceptible in malignant cells but only G1 in normal. Since caffeine inhibits DNA repair, we compared its effects on light-induced chromatid damage in the normal and malignant cells to assess their DNA repair capacities. Treatment of normal cells with caffeine (50 µg/ml) directly following five hr of light exposure in G1 increased the chromatid damage to that in malignant cells exposed with or without caffeine. Similarly, treatment of normal cells with caffeine during late S-G2 exposure increased chromatid damage to a level not significantly different from that in malignant cells exposed without caffeine. Caffeine had little influence on chromatid damage in malignant cells. The increased susceptibility of malignant mouse cells to fluorescent light-induced chromatid breaks thus appears to result from impaired capacities to repair DNA damage.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 2/28/80. Accepted 8/20/80.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1980 by the American Association for Cancer Research.