Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 40, 4485-4488, December 1, 1980]
© 1980 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lepock, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kruuv, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lepock, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kruuv, J.

Thermotolerance as a Possible Cause of the Critical Temperature at 43° in Mammalian Cells1

James R. Lepock and Jack Kruuv

Departments of Physics and Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1

Most mammalian cell lines appear to have a critical temperature near 43° in their response to hyperthermia. This critical temperature is usually defined as the temperature at which a break occurs in an Arrhenius plot of the rate of cell killing. Below this temperature, thermotolerance (the appearance of a more heat-resistant subpopulation during the survival curve) is also observed. This critical temperature may indicate a real change in the cellular response to heat or may be due to thermotolerance. For example, an apparent (measured) increase in the D0 relative to the actual D0 of the normal or sensitive population can be due to the following: (a) the presence of a normal (or sensitive) subpopulation and a thermotolerant subpopulation; (b) the induction with time of thermotolerance at a hyperthermic temperature in a defined subpopulation; or (c) the induction of thermotolerance with time in the surviving population. Thus, the critical temperature at 43° may be an artifact due to this increase in the measured D0 instead of being due to a change in the mode of inactivation of cells at that temperature. If this is true, the 43° critical temperature should be considered as the maximum temperature at which thermotolerance can be induced and not as an inflection point indicating two modes of cell killing.

1 Supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Received 3/10/80. Accepted 9/ 9/80.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1980 by the American Association for Cancer Research.