Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 40, 1830-1835, June 1, 1980]
© 1980 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binggeli, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, I. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binggeli, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, I. L.

Cellular Potentials of Normal and Cancerous Fibroblasts and Hepatocytes

Richard Binggeli1 and Ivan L. Cameron

Department of Anatomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033 [R. B.], and Department of Anatomy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78284 [I. L. C.]

Several lines of investigation point to differences in electrical properties between normal and cancerous cells. Several tumor lines have low-resting membrane potentials. A few comparisons have been made between normal and tumor cells within the same tissue cell type. This study compares the cellular or transmembrane potential of hepatocytes and fibroblasts in both normal and tumor cells.

High-impedance micropipets were used to record intracellularly in vivo in Buffalo rat hepatocytes and Morris 7777 hepatoma cells, as well as A/J mouse corneal fibroblasts and poorly differentiated fibrosarcoma cells.

Rat hepatocytes had a mean membrane potential of -37.1 ± 4.3 (S.D.) mV compared to -19.8 ± 7.1 mV in the hepatoma cells. Mouse corneal fibroblasts measured -42.5 ± 5.4 mV, while cells of mouse fibrosarcoma were -14.3 ± 5.4 mV. The membrane potentials of the tumor cells were lower in both instances than in their normal counterpart (statistically significant at p = 0.001 for both tissue cell types).

This supports the notion that lower cellular or membrane potentials may play a significant role in the altered physiology of the tumor cell.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Department of Anatomy, University of Southern California School of Medicine, 2025 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, Calif. 90033.

Received 9/19/79. Accepted 2/26/80.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
D. Sun, Y. Gong, H. Kojima, G. Wang, E. Ravinsky, M. Zhang, and G. Y. Minuk
Increasing cell membrane potential and GABAergic activity inhibits malignant hepatocyte growth
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 9, 2003; 285(1): G12 - G19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1980 by the American Association for Cancer Research.